🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on the island with a high participation. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.