🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," commented one MEP behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a future ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. An organization established by the family of a young person who was lost after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the local level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various individuals to follow the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, other nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this global conversation unfolds, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that states around the world are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.